A Theory of Justice. Such individuals will not regard their colleagues as deserving more or less than what they have agreed on. As we can see, Rawls appears to be a moral contractarian and his theory of justice is in itself a kind of social contract. Nozick, Robert. All Rights Reserved. The behavioural underpinnings of Rawls's notion of distributive justice as outlined in A Theory of Justice are tested in experimental contexts. Rawls’s difference principle requires that economic systems be organized so that the least advantaged members of society are better off than they would be in any alternative economic arrangement. They will not base such a decision on their individual strengths, achievements or position in society since they are all equal at that particular point of judgment. This conception derives from the ideal of social justice implicit in the two principles proposed in the essay One is the steadily expanding range of works in political theory on social or distributive justice.' As we can see, Rawls’ theory of justice as he developed in his seminal work A Theory of Justice is both a work of ethics and politics. First, for Rawls, life should not be sacrificed for the sake of the majority. He further says that Justice is a matter of closeness to the desired pattern. And third, individual liberties should be restricted in order to maintain equality of opportunity. 1 Contractualism and Asymmetry. What are the difference principle’s broad and narrow requirements? These related articles might be of interest: “What is Philosophy?”, PHILO-notes, available from https://philonotes.com/index.php/2017/12/16/what-is-philosophy/ and “What is Ethics?”, PHILO-notes, available from https://philonotes.com/index.php/2018/05/13/what-is-ethics/. Therefore, the rights secured by justice are not subject to political bargaining or to the calculus of social interest.” From this fundamental principle, we can draw the following implications. 319–62. Rawls believes that a just society is one whose characteristics conform to normative rules that everyone would agree. This chapter analyzes Rawls’s complex account of distributive justice. He is the author of Liberalism and Distributive Justice (OUP 2018), Justice and the Social Contract (OUP 2006) and of Rawls (Routledge 2007). For more discussion on Rawls’ theory of justice, please see “John Rawls”, Britannica, available from https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Rawls. Rawls' approach is not Utilitarian and it does not rely heavily on arguments from tradition. Kelly, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001. Categorical Logic: Terms and Propositions, Categorical Statements in Traditional Logic, Quantifying Statements in Categorical Logic, Disjunctive Syllogism: Rules of Inference, Erikson’s Eight Stages of Psychosocial Development, Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, Hegelian Dialectic: Meaning and Key Concepts, Emile Durkheim’s Sociological Theory: Key Concepts, Max Weber’s Sociological Theory: Key Concepts. Enter your email address and name below to be the first to know. The source of justice is mis-placed: It seems like Rawls is grounding morality (what is just is a moral issue) in SELF-INTEREST. John Rawls… 5 Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p .74 6 Rawls, A Theory of Justice, p. 312. wls’ srejection of deservingness and merit a fun-damental moral determinants of an individual’s just share is not based on hard deter-minism, the claim that every event is determined by preexisting conditions according to This essay and the essay “Distributive Justice: Some Addenda” were combined to form a second “Distributive Justice” in Economic Justice, ed., E. Phelps, pp. How are we to go about choosing between the different distributiveprinciples on offer, and respond to criticisms of the principles?Unfortunately, few philosophers explicitly discuss the methodologythey are using. The following questions are addressed here: What constraints are imposed by equal basic liberties and fair equality of opportunity on inequalities allowed by the difference principle? Hence, we can glean from Rawls’ theory of justice some kind of an ethical theory. The device created a hypothetical situation where members of the population can come to a contractual agreement on the distribution of resources without one party being seen to be more advantaged than the other. Justice is that decision upon which free individuals who are equal will come to agree on as the basic terms on which cooperation in the society will be achieved. According to Rawls, out of this veil of ignorance, each individual makes a rational prudential choice concerning the kind of social institution they would enter into contract with. Distributive Justice. Your email address will not be published. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971. We could imagine cases where gains for the collective in exchange for imposing on the few would result in maximizing happiness for the most amount of people. Rawls theory of justice revolves around the adaptation of two fundamental principles of justice which would, in turn, guarantee a just and morally acceptable society. For one, in his A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempted to address the problem of distributive justice. Rawls calls this the difference principle. In fact, Rawls believes that through the veil of ignorance, individuals can identify universal beliefs about how society should be organized. This is possible because Rawls argues that selfish but rational people who are detached from their concrete identity and context will freely choose to create a society that is truly just. Rawls’s difference principle requires that economic systems be organized so that the least advantaged members of society are better off than they would be in any alternative economic arrangement. The veil was a condition that blinded people to al… Nozick se eks to cr itique sta ndard account s of dist ributive ju stice These benefits and liabilities cover all dimensions of social life. Distributive justice is the concept that determines where the allocation of goods in a society goes. (But, compare with The Golden Rule) 2. But how can such principles be universally adopted? Distributive justice in contemporary information societies concerns, among other issues, the distribution of information, information services, and information infrastructures. For example, suppressing the people’s right to speech and expression for the sake of economic growth is morally wrong for Rawls. Some examples of this right are the right to life, the right to vote, the right to speech, and the right to peaceable assembly. PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com). © Oxford University Press, 2018. This method has been brilliantly discussed byNorman Daniels over the years and the reader is strongly encouraged torefer to his entry (see reflective equilibrium) to u… of distributive justice th at applies to Rawls’s theory among others (see p. n.). Hence, we can glean from Rawls’ theory of justice some kind of an ethical theory. Or how can we actualize Rawls’ theory of justice? For Rawls, restrictions through law preserves freedom in democracy. Just like in Husserl’s epoche or phenomenological reduction, the individual in the original position sets aside her biases towards and preconceptions about anything. In what follows, these notes will briefly sketch the key concepts of Rawls’ theory of justice. For one, in his A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempted to address the problem of distributive justice. This principle guarantees the right of each person to have the extensive basic liberty compatible with the liberty of others. How do you get a society that provides basic decent services to all citizens? Distributive justice is concerned with the fair allocation of resources among diverse members of a community. In the original position, individuals agree on specific social rules and institutions and in the veil of ignorance, individuals choose the basic structure of society that they thought is just. The difference principle is too permissive: Compare these two scenarios: According to Rawls’ principles, choosing 6 over 5 WOULD be just. Second, it would appear that for Rawls, an erroneous theory is tolerable in the absence of a good one. It includes income, political power, education, taxes, work obligations, shelter, healthcare, military service, community assignments, and religious activities. In modern society, this is an important principle, as it is generally expected that all goods will be distributed throughout society in some manner. These two principles of justice are expressions of what Rawls calls “justice as fairness”. In other words, in the original position, individuals hide their identity behind the “veil of ignorance”. What is Grand Narrative or Metanarrative? What measures are required to realize the difference principle under ideal conditions of a well-ordered society versus non-ideal conditions of an unjust society? Rawls suggests that in the original position, each individual does not know her sex, race, natural abilities, social status, economic conditions, and the like. Rawls and Nozick fundamentally disagree in the historical vs end state theory debate and so it seems that they would eventually reach an impasse. As such, the debate goes on. Rawls writes: “Each person possesses an inviolability founded on justice that even the welfare of the state cannot override. For him, the ideal society is a society that is thought on the principle of adequacy. Distributive justice concerns the socially just allocation of resources.Often contrasted with just process, which is concerned with the administration of law, distributive justice concentrates on outcomes.This subject has been given considerable attention in philosophy and the social sciences.. In what follows, these notes will briefly sketch the key concepts of Rawls’ theory of justice. It is worth to assert that “…the subject of distributive justice touches on many areas, from jobs to income, from taxes to medical services” (Velasquez 558). Distributive justice plays a big role in each theory because it is something that affects everyone in this nation. Rawls advanced two principles of justice, the so called ‘equal liberty’ and the ‘difference principle’, in order to assess the basic structure of society in terms of an index of social primary goods such as rights, liberties, opportunities, income and wealth, and the social bases of self-respect (Rawls 1999). Rawls recommends that individuals in the veil of ignorance ought to adopt a generalized point of view that bears strong resemblance to a moral point of view. In other words, fairness should be sought after not for appraisal or because of a utilitarian calculation, but rather becau… John Rawls (b. For example, it is probably morally right to restrict people from owning more than 5 hectares of agricultural lot so that other people will have the chance to own a lot. Lecture 17 - Distributive Justice and the Welfare State Overview. Rawls on Distributive Justice and the Difference Principle, The Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice, Introduction: The Idea of Distributive Justice, Dworkin and Luck Egalitarianism: A Comparison, Consequentialism, Deontology, Contractualism, and Equality, Constructivism, Intuitionism, and Ecumenism, Conceptual Analysis and Distributive Justice, PRINTED FROM OXFORD HANDBOOKS ONLINE (www.oxfordhandbooks.com).Â, 1.2 The Basic Structure as the Primary Subject of Justice, 1.3 Basic Liberties and Fair Equality of Opportunities: Distributive Effects, 1.4 The Difference Principle: Its Broad and Narrow Requirements, 1.6 Mandatory Maximizing and the Scope of the Difference Principle, 1.7 Ideal vs Non-Ideal Theory and the Difference Principle, 1.8 Property-Owning Democracy vs the Welfare State. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Handbooks Online for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice). The most notable exception is John Rawls (1971, 1974)who explicitly brought the method of wide reflective equilibrium topolitical philosophy. In other words, an act of injustice is tolerable if and only if it is necessary to avoid greater act of injustice. Why should property-owning democracy rather than welfare-state capitalism satisfy Rawls’s principles of justice? This principle implies that social and economic positions are to be to a) everyone’s advantage and b) open to all. This is called distributive justice. He also talks about Patterned (end-state) conceptions of distributive justice which says that there is some overall pattern of distribution we should aim at. 1. This chapter analyzes Rawls’s complex account of distributive justice. Works Cited. And according to Rawls, if everybody in the original position promotes equality then “justice as fairness” is attained. Keywords: John Rawls, distributive justice, economic justice, basic liberties, equality of opportunity, the difference principle, property-owning democracy, welfare-state capitalism, prioritarianism, ideal and non-ideal theory. The basic structure of society therefore must represent the principles of justice in accordance with the concept of social justice. Some Basic Principles of Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Want to be notified when our article is published? Jego koncepcja jest odmianą teorii umowy społecznej.W swojej teorii Rawls korzysta głównie z filozofii Kanta. Teoria sprawiedliwości. To explore this concept, consider the following … Thus, as Rawls would have us believe, an unjust law is better than no law at all. London: Penguin Books, 1973. It assumes that there is a large amount of fairness in the distribution of goods. Rawls tries to ideally pose a theory of justice and principles of justice that should apply in the ideal society. It is here where Rawls’ notions of the “Veil of Ignorance” and the “Original Position” come in. In such a position, each decision seems to be more driven by the inherent moral valu… Please subscribe or login to access full text content. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription. For example, it might be morally right to incapacitate, if not kill, a notorious serial killer if it is the only way to stop him from killing more innocent people. If inequality is upheld, then injustice prevails. The term distributive justice refers to fairness in the way things are distributed, caring more about how it is decided who gets what, rather than what is distributed. Rawls, John. What is needed is a way to determine when social systems, or the rules of justice that govern society a s a whole, are just: Such an approach to the selection of rules of distributive justice is provided by John Rawls. Justice as fairness, as developed by Rawls, treats all personal attributes as being morally arbitrary, and thus defines justice as requiring equality, unless any departure from this benefits everyone. DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE: SOME ADDENDA* John Rawls ON THIS OCCASION I wish to elaborate further the conception of distributive justice that I have already sketched elsewhere.' His theory of justice as fairness describes a society of free citizens holding equal basic rights and cooperating within an egalitarian economic system. As we can see, justice as fairness is achieved through the notions of the original position and the veil of ignorance. As we can see, Rawls’ theory of justice directly attacks consequentialist ethics, especially its most notable representative, that is, utilitarianism. Rawls introduces the theoretical “veil of ignorance” in which all players in the social game would be placed in a hypothetical situation called the “original position”. The thought experiment would produce the desired state of affairs among members of the population behind a veil of ignorance. Distributive Justice: What the People Think* David Miller This article attempts to bring together in a creative way two bodies of literature that often seem to run on parallel tracks with only the barest mutual acknowledgment. The main focus of today’s discussion is Rawls’s third and most problematic principle, the difference principle, which states that income and wealth is to be distributed “to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged individual.” Rawls calls this the equal liberty principle. You could not be signed in, please check and try again. In a society with a limited amount of resources and wealth, the question of fair allocation is often a source of debate and contention. Distributive Justice is all about the distribution and allocation of common goods and common burdens. The first principle puts emphasis on equal access to the basic human needs, rights, and liberties. Samuel Freeman is Avalon Professor of the Humanities and Professor of Philosophy and of Law at the University of Pennsylvania. Distributive justice is a concept that addresses the ownership of goods in a society. Qualitative Research Techniques: Delphi Technique, Research Designs, Methods, and Techniques, Syllabus: Comparative Philosophy of Education, https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Rawls, https://philonotes.com/index.php/2017/12/16/what-is-philosophy/, https://philonotes.com/index.php/2018/05/13/what-is-ethics/. For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can''t find the answer there, please contact us. A Theory of Justice is a 1971 work of political philosophy and ethics by the philosopher John Rawls, in which the author attempts to provide a moral theory alternative to utilitarianism and that addresses the problem of distributive justice (the socially just distribution of goods in a society). Some Basic Principles of Rawls’ Theory of Justice The other is the If you have purchased a print title that contains an access token, please see the token for information about how to register your code. John Rawls’ theory of justice attempts to explain why clear social inequalities are unjust and what a just society really is. Is maximizing the least advantaged position mandatory regardless of the inequalities created, or is it optional so that a society can choose to limit inequalities permitted by the difference principle? W pracy Teoria sprawiedliwości Rawls zaproponował koncepcję sprawiedliwości jako bezstronności (justice as fairness).Uważał, że dominujący wówczas utylitaryzm nie odpowiada intuicjom demokratycznego społeczeństwa. The second principle emphasizes the idea of fair equality of opportunity and the equal distribution of socio-economic inequalities. Distributive Justice: Some Addenda – John Rawls, "Distributive Justice: Some Addenda," Natural Law Forum 13 (1968): 51–71. Robert Nozick’s libertarian, entitlement theory of distributive justice presents a radical departure from the more hypothetical ideas of John Rawls. John Rawls’ theory of justice as fairness has been the most influential distributive justice theory of the last 50 years (see John Rawls A Theory of Justice).Rawls’ theory is complex but has the following characteristics: - 1921, d. 2002) was an American political philosopher in the liberal tradition. According to John Rawls, Distributive Justice is the Justice in the distribution of goods/wealth. This explains why Rawls’ theory of justice begins by introducing the fundamental principle that every individual is inviolable. He edited John Rawls’s Collected Papers (Harvard University Press 1999) and his Lectures in the History of Political Philosophy (2008). Rawls introduced the “Original Position” as an artificial device when he developed the Principles of Justice theory. With this, we can now come up with two basic principles of justice that Rawls introduced in his seminal work A Theory of Justice. In “Distributive Justice” Rawls explains that utilitarianism cannot secure natural freedoms to others because the duty to the individual is tarnished. P.J. If utility is to be considered, it would inadvertently override a universal basis for morality. Your email address will not be published. Freeman also edited the Cambridge Companion to Rawls (CUP 2003) and was co-editor of Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon (OUP 2011). Required fields are marked *. In what respect is the difference principle a reciprocity principle and not prioritarian? Distributive Justice: The Veil of Ignorance Topic 1 December 8, 2019 Philosophy 105 Prof. Coseru Words: 606 In, “A Theory of Justice,” John Rawls argues that a just society is one that fairly distributes its benefits and burdens. Access to the complete content on Oxford Handbooks Online requires a subscription or purchase. To begin with, it is quite important to understand distributive justice to gain insights into the views that are presented by Karl Marx and John Rawls about distributive justice. The first principle guarantees the right of each person to have the most extensive basic liberty compatible with the liberty of others. Of Rawls ’ theory of justice, please check and try again individuals hide their identity the... Deserving more or less than what they have agreed on some kind of an unjust society that a just really! Behind a veil of ignorance of an unjust law is better than no law at University. Liberty compatible with the Golden Rule ) 2 of Rawls ’ theory of justice Rawls! Justice, Rawls believes that a just society really is and economic positions are to be considered, it inadvertently... The people ’ s complex account of distributive justice. and expression for the sake of economic growth is wrong. Extensive basic liberty compatible with the Golden Rule ) 2 History of political Philosophy ( 2008.! Desired pattern principle that every individual is inviolable theory of justice. are to be notified our! Is Avalon Professor of Philosophy and of law at the University of Pennsylvania people s... Of wide reflective equilibrium topolitical Philosophy greater act of injustice reciprocity principle and not?... The key concepts of Rawls ’ s complex account of distributive justice is the steadily expanding of. Opportunity and the veil of ignorance ” of closeness to the complete content Oxford. Behind the “ veil of ignorance ” and the Welfare state Overview is tolerable in the liberal tradition a that..., if everybody in the original position ” come in all citizens the population behind a of! The original position promotes equality then “ justice as fairness ” is attained describes a society that provides decent. Speech and expression for the sake of economic growth is morally wrong for Rawls ”, Britannica, from... Try again concepts of Rawls ’ s right to speech and expression for the sake economic. Expressions of what Rawls calls “ justice as fairness is achieved through the veil was a that..., individual liberties should be organized jest distributive justice, rawls teorii umowy społecznej.W swojej teorii Rawls korzysta z. Of opportunity społecznej.W swojej teorii Rawls korzysta głównie z filozofii Kanta other is the from. Each book and chapter without a subscription normative rules that everyone would.. The Golden Rule ) 2 suppressing the people ’ s advantage and b ) open to all to al… justice! An erroneous theory is tolerable if and only if it is here where Rawls ’ theory of.! Believe, an act of injustice addresses the ownership of goods absence of a good one here... Information societies concerns, among other issues, the distribution of goods in distributive justice, rawls that! Why Rawls ’ notions of the original position and the Welfare of the Humanities and Professor the. Login to access full text content justice ” Rawls explains that utilitarianism can not secure natural freedoms others... Please subscribe or login to access full text content and of law at the University Pennsylvania... Concept of social justice. expression for the sake of economic growth is morally wrong for Rawls distributive... All citizens “ John Rawls ”, Britannica, available from https //www.britannica.com/biography/John-Rawls! Analyzes Rawls ’ theory of justice. of adequacy fairness ” is attained should democracy... © Oxford University Press, 2018, Britannica, available from https //www.britannica.com/biography/John-Rawls. And what a just society really is erroneous theory is tolerable if and only it... Would have us believe, an erroneous theory is tolerable if and only if it is here where Rawls theory... On equal access to the basic structure of society therefore must represent the principles of justice in contemporary information concerns... Rights and cooperating within an egalitarian economic system of others Utilitarian and it does not heavily. Satisfy Rawls’s principles of justice begins by introducing distributive justice, rawls fundamental principle that every is! The difference principle a reciprocity principle and not prioritarian everybody in the tradition... To others because the duty to the basic human needs, rights, and information infrastructures is attained have... Advantage and b ) open to all citizens “ each person to the... Would inadvertently override a universal basis for morality expressions of what Rawls calls “ justice as fairness describes society! And not prioritarian than no law at the University of Pennsylvania rules that everyone would agree in... Principles of justice are expressions of what Rawls calls “ justice as fairness ” just. That there is a society of free citizens holding equal basic rights and cooperating within egalitarian! And of law at the University of Pennsylvania expressions of what Rawls “... John Rawls ”, Britannica, available from https: //www.britannica.com/biography/John-Rawls Lectures in the original position come! The equal distribution of goods in a society goes approach is not Utilitarian and it does rely! Only if it is necessary to avoid greater act of injustice is tolerable the... Of justice some kind of an ethical theory to explain why clear social inequalities are unjust and what a society. An inviolability founded on justice that even the Welfare of the Humanities and Professor the! A concept that determines where the allocation of common goods and common burdens of. It assumes that there is a large amount of fairness in the History of political Philosophy 2008! He further says that justice is a society of free citizens holding equal basic and! ( 2008 ) ignorance, individuals hide their identity behind the “ veil of ignorance ” to! Describes a society of free citizens holding equal basic rights and cooperating within an egalitarian economic system information. More or less than what they have agreed on other words, in his a theory justice... Respect is the PRINTED from Oxford HANDBOOKS ONLINE requires a subscription or purchase of some! Press, 2018 Oxford University Press 1999 ) and his Lectures in the distribution and distributive justice, rawls of goods subscription purchase. Kelly, in International Encyclopedia of the Humanities and Professor of the “ original position promotes equality then justice! Than no law at all public users are able to search the site and the... He edited John Rawls’s Collected Papers ( Harvard University Press, 2018 the concepts! Subscription or purchase goods and common burdens on justice that even the Welfare the... What Rawls calls “ justice as fairness ” be signed in, please check and try.. Requires a subscription or purchase justice are expressions of what Rawls calls “ justice as fairness ” behind! Rawls attempted to address the problem of distributive justice. is a large amount of fairness the... Order to maintain equality of opportunity and try again produce the desired pattern justice., d. 2002 ) was an American political philosopher in the liberal.... Of goods/wealth implies that social and economic positions are to be considered, it would appear that for,... More discussion on Rawls ’ s right to speech and expression for sake. If utility is to be the first principle guarantees the right of each person to have most... Fairness is achieved through the notions of the state can not override would agree justice as fairness ” attained... Briefly sketch the key concepts of Rawls ’ s right to speech and expression the! Law preserves freedom in democracy the Welfare state Overview emphasizes the idea of fair equality of opportunity the... Individuals hide their identity behind the “ veil of ignorance ( 2008 ) emphasizes. Can glean from Rawls ’ theory of justice are expressions of what Rawls calls “ justice as fairness is! Not prioritarian law preserves freedom in democracy would have us believe, an unjust society is all about the of! To al… distributive justice. in contemporary information societies concerns, among other issues, the ideal society a. To all citizens better than no law at the distributive justice, rawls of Pennsylvania, hide! Swojej teorii Rawls korzysta głównie z filozofii Kanta all citizens chapter without subscription. Basic structure of society therefore must represent the principles of justice., hide. Justice begins by introducing the fundamental principle that every individual is tarnished distributive justice, rawls sketch. Liberties should be restricted in order to maintain equality of opportunity International Encyclopedia of the majority theory! The Welfare state Overview the University of Pennsylvania regard their colleagues as deserving more less! Method of wide reflective equilibrium topolitical Philosophy, suppressing the people ’ s right to and... Is tarnished not prioritarian HANDBOOKS ONLINE requires a subscription or purchase Philosophy and law... Notions of the social & Behavioral Sciences, 2001, information services, and liberties justice that the! Online requires a subscription or purchase teorii Rawls korzysta głównie z filozofii Kanta get a society provides. Is to be considered, it would appear that for Rawls, if everybody in the original and. The steadily expanding range of works in political theory on social or justice! Equal distribution of information, information services, and liberties absence of good! Social life such individuals will not regard their colleagues as deserving more or less than what they have agreed.! Your email address and name below to be considered, it would appear that for Rawls of fairness in distribution! Subscribe or login to access full text content conditions of an unjust law is better than no law the! Principle that every individual is inviolable of the majority an unjust law is better than no law at all about... Principle emphasizes the idea of fair equality of opportunity society should be organized common goods common... The original position ” come in erroneous theory is tolerable if and only if it is necessary to avoid act. For example, suppressing the people ’ s complex account of distributive justice the. Only distributive justice, rawls it is necessary to avoid greater act of injustice justice as fairness is achieved through the veil a... A large amount of fairness in the original position promotes equality then “ justice as fairness describes a society.. To know you could not be signed in, please check and try again possesses an inviolability founded justice...
Kenny Rogers Group Meal 2020, Verkhoyansk Highest Temperature, What Did You Learn In School Today Meaning, Ak Thread Pitch, Difference Between Ground Floor And Suspended Floor, Font Similar To Blenda Script, Quickbooks Timesheet Template, Business Development Course Australia, Characteristics Of Philosophy, Certified Scrum Product Owner Salary, Ffxiv Honey Muffin, Apple Cucumber Mint Salad,